https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326716 The court upheld the Settlement Commission's decision, rejecting the petitioner's arguments regarding excise duty liability and penalties. The Commission's order quantifying duty liability and penalties was deemed valid, emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions. The court dismissed the petition, stating that factual aspects cannot be reviewed under writ jurisdiction against the Settlement Commission's order. en-us Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Nov 2016 16:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326716 The court upheld the Settlement Commission's decision, rejecting the petitioner's arguments regarding excise duty liability and penalties. The Commission's order quantifying duty liability and penalties was deemed valid, emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions. The court dismissed the petition, stating that factual aspects cannot be reviewed under writ jurisdiction against the Settlement Commission's order. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326716