<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 612 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181719</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee, a Foreign Bank, on both issues. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, allowing deductions for salary and perquisites under &quot;interest on securities&quot; and permitting head office expenses under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, rejecting the revenue&#039;s contentions on Section 44C applicability. Each party was directed to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 612 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181719</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee, a Foreign Bank, on both issues. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, allowing deductions for salary and perquisites under &quot;interest on securities&quot; and permitting head office expenses under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, rejecting the revenue&#039;s contentions on Section 44C applicability. Each party was directed to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>