<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 56 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3131</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with the appellants being permitted to re-export the goods upon payment of the revised fine and penalty, without the need for additional duty payment. The Tribunal found the original fine and penalty imposed to be disproportionate and reduced them significantly based on the circumstances of the case. The decision was made considering the misdeclaration of goods by the importer and the corresponding penalty under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 56 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3131</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with the appellants being permitted to re-export the goods upon payment of the revised fine and penalty, without the need for additional duty payment. The Tribunal found the original fine and penalty imposed to be disproportionate and reduced them significantly based on the circumstances of the case. The decision was made considering the misdeclaration of goods by the importer and the corresponding penalty under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>