https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181700 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision in a case concerning the legality of the appellant's removal from government service. The appellant's removal was based on circumstantial evidence of dishonest conduct, including receiving money and failing to take action. The Court found that the High Court appropriately reviewed the evidence and concluded that the disciplinary proceedings were valid. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling that there was no error of law justifying interference under Article 226 of the Constitution. en-us Wed, 19 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Apr 2016 11:17:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181700 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision in a case concerning the legality of the appellant's removal from government service. The appellant's removal was based on circumstantial evidence of dishonest conduct, including receiving money and failing to take action. The Court found that the High Court appropriately reviewed the evidence and concluded that the disciplinary proceedings were valid. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling that there was no error of law justifying interference under Article 226 of the Constitution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181700