<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1066 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181682</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta remanded the case involving the Central Bank of India back to the Deputy Commissioner for fresh adjudication, setting aside previous orders. The Court emphasized the importance of establishing the department&#039;s right to invoke the longer limitation period and determining any short payment by the bank. The decision aimed to ensure a fair resolution within a specified timeframe, highlighting the authority of the Court to pass orders to condone delays in the interest of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2016 13:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1066 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181682</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta remanded the case involving the Central Bank of India back to the Deputy Commissioner for fresh adjudication, setting aside previous orders. The Court emphasized the importance of establishing the department&#039;s right to invoke the longer limitation period and determining any short payment by the bank. The decision aimed to ensure a fair resolution within a specified timeframe, highlighting the authority of the Court to pass orders to condone delays in the interest of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>