<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 825 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326711</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds, emphasizing the importance of the nature of contracts in determining TDS obligations and the deductibility of expenses such as liquidated damages. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the judgments pronounced on 19.04.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:50:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 825 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326711</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all grounds, emphasizing the importance of the nature of contracts in determining TDS obligations and the deductibility of expenses such as liquidated damages. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the judgments pronounced on 19.04.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>