<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 807 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326693</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the A.O. to delete the penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee and dismissing the appeal filed by the revenue. The judgment emphasized that penalty provisions should be strictly construed and applied only when conditions stipulated in the law are unambiguously satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:49:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 807 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326693</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the A.O. to delete the penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee and dismissing the appeal filed by the revenue. The judgment emphasized that penalty provisions should be strictly construed and applied only when conditions stipulated in the law are unambiguously satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>