<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 803 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326689</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) to adopt the Resale Price Method (RPM) over the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) in international transactions involving industrial automation products. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the use of RPM as the appropriate method based on precedent and the TPO&#039;s acceptance in a similar case for a subsequent year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 803 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326689</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) to adopt the Resale Price Method (RPM) over the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) in international transactions involving industrial automation products. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the use of RPM as the appropriate method based on precedent and the TPO&#039;s acceptance in a similar case for a subsequent year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>