<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 800 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326686</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay considered a request for an extension of time for auction/sale by the Commissioner of Service Tax V, Mumbai Commissionerate. The Court scrutinized the auction process for an aircraft, expressing concerns about the lack of essential documentation and emphasizing the need for independent compliance by the Service Tax Commissioner. The Court scheduled a follow-up hearing to monitor progress and stressed the importance of genuine efforts from the officials involved in complying with the Court&#039;s directives. The Commissioner and Chief Commissioner were held personally responsible for ensuring compliance with the Court&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 800 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326686</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay considered a request for an extension of time for auction/sale by the Commissioner of Service Tax V, Mumbai Commissionerate. The Court scrutinized the auction process for an aircraft, expressing concerns about the lack of essential documentation and emphasizing the need for independent compliance by the Service Tax Commissioner. The Court scheduled a follow-up hearing to monitor progress and stressed the importance of genuine efforts from the officials involved in complying with the Court&#039;s directives. The Commissioner and Chief Commissioner were held personally responsible for ensuring compliance with the Court&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>