<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 799 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326685</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders and directed the original authority to reexamine the records provided by the respondent within three months. Refund eligibility should not be denied based on non-registration, and the respondent should be given an opportunity to be heard during the reexamination process. The High Court emphasized the importance of proper consideration in verifying the relation between input and output services for refund eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 799 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326685</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders and directed the original authority to reexamine the records provided by the respondent within three months. Refund eligibility should not be denied based on non-registration, and the respondent should be given an opportunity to be heard during the reexamination process. The High Court emphasized the importance of proper consideration in verifying the relation between input and output services for refund eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>