<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 798 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326684</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, ruling that the Department could not challenge the Tribunal&#039;s findings on interest demand for the unpaid duty when the assessee had sufficient credit in their account. Additionally, the Court cited legal precedent to support its decision that interest was not payable as the Department had excess funds available for adjustment. The Court criticized the Department&#039;s demand for interest despite the availability of credit, ultimately dismissing the appeals in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2017 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 798 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326684</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, ruling that the Department could not challenge the Tribunal&#039;s findings on interest demand for the unpaid duty when the assessee had sufficient credit in their account. Additionally, the Court cited legal precedent to support its decision that interest was not payable as the Department had excess funds available for adjustment. The Court criticized the Department&#039;s demand for interest despite the availability of credit, ultimately dismissing the appeals in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>