<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 795 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326681</link>
    <description>The appeals regarding the demand for additional duty of excise were dismissed. Appeals related to specific Orders in Original were allowed in favor of the assessee, while others were dismissed due to show cause notices dated exactly 11.5.2001. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 795 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326681</link>
      <description>The appeals regarding the demand for additional duty of excise were dismissed. Appeals related to specific Orders in Original were allowed in favor of the assessee, while others were dismissed due to show cause notices dated exactly 11.5.2001. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>