https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326677 The High Court dismissed the appeal due to a delay of 65 days in filing, exceeding the condonable 30-day limit. The Court affirmed its jurisdiction under Article 226 to entertain a writ directly against the original order, emphasizing specific circumstances where a writ petition could challenge the original adjudicating authority's order. The petitioner's explanation for the delay was deemed insufficient, highlighting the legislative intent to restrict appeals within the specified timeframe. The Court stressed the importance of a well-explained delay and prevention of gross injustice, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the petition. en-us Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:46:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326677 The High Court dismissed the appeal due to a delay of 65 days in filing, exceeding the condonable 30-day limit. The Court affirmed its jurisdiction under Article 226 to entertain a writ directly against the original order, emphasizing specific circumstances where a writ petition could challenge the original adjudicating authority's order. The petitioner's explanation for the delay was deemed insufficient, highlighting the legislative intent to restrict appeals within the specified timeframe. The Court stressed the importance of a well-explained delay and prevention of gross injustice, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the petition. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326677