<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 789 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326675</link>
    <description>The Court disposed of the Writ Petition, instructing the Authorities to determine interest on the refund claim based on statutory provisions and refund delay, within four weeks. The judgment clarified the limited jurisdiction of the Authorities post-remand to decide on the interest quantum on the sanctioned refund, emphasizing no intent to reopen the claim but asserting no interest due on timely payment under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:46:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 789 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326675</link>
      <description>The Court disposed of the Writ Petition, instructing the Authorities to determine interest on the refund claim based on statutory provisions and refund delay, within four weeks. The judgment clarified the limited jurisdiction of the Authorities post-remand to decide on the interest quantum on the sanctioned refund, emphasizing no intent to reopen the claim but asserting no interest due on timely payment under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>