<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 784 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326670</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus against a Public Limited Company for failing to issue &quot;C&quot; Forms under the Central Sales Tax Act. The court emphasized the delay in seeking relief through writ jurisdiction after the completion of the commercial transaction, noting that civil remedies could have been pursued instead. It found that the petitioners&#039; case did not warrant discretionary and equitable relief in writ jurisdiction, leading to the dismissal of the petition due to the lack of justification and delay in seeking redress.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:45:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 784 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326670</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus against a Public Limited Company for failing to issue &quot;C&quot; Forms under the Central Sales Tax Act. The court emphasized the delay in seeking relief through writ jurisdiction after the completion of the commercial transaction, noting that civil remedies could have been pursued instead. It found that the petitioners&#039; case did not warrant discretionary and equitable relief in writ jurisdiction, leading to the dismissal of the petition due to the lack of justification and delay in seeking redress.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>