https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326668 The court held that the Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, was considered an "aggrieved person" under Section 17(2) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, and had the authority to file an appeal. The court found that the appeal was not decided in violation of the principles of natural justice, as the appellants were given an opportunity to be heard. The court dismissed the writ appeal, ruling in favor of the Assistant Director and denying the appellants' request for a certificate under Article 134A of the Constitution of India. en-us Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:45:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326668 The court held that the Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, was considered an "aggrieved person" under Section 17(2) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, and had the authority to file an appeal. The court found that the appeal was not decided in violation of the principles of natural justice, as the appellants were given an opportunity to be heard. The court dismissed the writ appeal, ruling in favor of the Assistant Director and denying the appellants' request for a certificate under Article 134A of the Constitution of India. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326668