https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181678 The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer violated the principles of natural justice by not providing copies of statements and evidence to the assessee as directed. The addition of Rs. 1.50 crores based on a retracted statement was deemed improper. The estimation of undisclosed income disregarded evidence provided by the assessee. Treating the assessee's wife as a benamidar without sufficient evidence was also criticized. The Tribunal set aside the assessment orders, directing a de novo assessment with supplied statements and imposed a cost on the A.O for non-compliance and judicial discipline violation. Appeals by both parties were allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:59:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181678 The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer violated the principles of natural justice by not providing copies of statements and evidence to the assessee as directed. The addition of Rs. 1.50 crores based on a retracted statement was deemed improper. The estimation of undisclosed income disregarded evidence provided by the assessee. Treating the assessee's wife as a benamidar without sufficient evidence was also criticized. The Tribunal set aside the assessment orders, directing a de novo assessment with supplied statements and imposed a cost on the A.O for non-compliance and judicial discipline violation. Appeals by both parties were allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181678