<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 53 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3120</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant lacked legal standing to file an appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act as they were not a party in the proceedings and did not suffer any legal grievance. Granting leave to file an appeal was considered detrimental to tax administration and economic health. The appeal was dismissed without addressing the substantive issues raised by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 53 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3120</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant lacked legal standing to file an appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act as they were not a party in the proceedings and did not suffer any legal grievance. Granting leave to file an appeal was considered detrimental to tax administration and economic health. The appeal was dismissed without addressing the substantive issues raised by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>