<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 596 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181660</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld its decision to annul the reassessment order under section 147 of the Income Tax Act. It emphasized the necessity of valid reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings, stating that without proper grounds for believing income had escaped taxation, reassessments would be deemed invalid. The Tribunal found that the assessee had filed a revised return within the allowed time, rendering the excess depreciation claim as the only item escaping assessment, which was not sufficient to warrant reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 13:05:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 596 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181660</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld its decision to annul the reassessment order under section 147 of the Income Tax Act. It emphasized the necessity of valid reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings, stating that without proper grounds for believing income had escaped taxation, reassessments would be deemed invalid. The Tribunal found that the assessee had filed a revised return within the allowed time, rendering the excess depreciation claim as the only item escaping assessment, which was not sufficient to warrant reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>