<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1066 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181659</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT (A)&#039;s order regarding the treatment of excise duty in the total turnover u/s 10B for the assessment year 2004-05. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision, citing a previous order in the assessee&#039;s favor for the preceding assessment year. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, affirming that excise duty was not to be included in the total turnover u/s 10B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:32:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1066 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181659</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT (A)&#039;s order regarding the treatment of excise duty in the total turnover u/s 10B for the assessment year 2004-05. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision, citing a previous order in the assessee&#039;s favor for the preceding assessment year. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, affirming that excise duty was not to be included in the total turnover u/s 10B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>