<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1137 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181656</link>
    <description>Transmission, wheeling and SLDC charges paid for use of an electricity network were held not to constitute fees for technical services, so no tax was deductible under section 194J. The alternative contention under section 194C was also rejected on the same reasoning, leaving the assessee under no TDS obligation on these payments. As no tax was deductible, interest under section 201(1A) could not be charged because the alleged default did not exist. The deletion of the TDS demand and consequential interest was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:46:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1137 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181656</link>
      <description>Transmission, wheeling and SLDC charges paid for use of an electricity network were held not to constitute fees for technical services, so no tax was deductible under section 194J. The alternative contention under section 194C was also rejected on the same reasoning, leaving the assessee under no TDS obligation on these payments. As no tax was deductible, interest under section 201(1A) could not be charged because the alleged default did not exist. The deletion of the TDS demand and consequential interest was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>