<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 695 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181653</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) decision in a case involving an association of Air Cargo Agents. The issue revolved around the addition of amounts received from members and invested in Mutual Funds, with the association claiming exemption under the principle of mutuality. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the CIT(A) order was upheld based on mutuality principles and past assessments, with the Tribunal citing a Bombay High Court precedent supporting mutuality in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:32:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 695 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181653</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) decision in a case involving an association of Air Cargo Agents. The issue revolved around the addition of amounts received from members and invested in Mutual Funds, with the association claiming exemption under the principle of mutuality. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the CIT(A) order was upheld based on mutuality principles and past assessments, with the Tribunal citing a Bombay High Court precedent supporting mutuality in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>