<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 774 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181652</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of goods under Chapter 94 of the Central Excise Tariff, dismissing M/s. Tanzeem Screenarts&#039; appeal and allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the impugned order. The case was heard in compliance with a remand order from the Supreme Court, addressing the classification issue collectively in two appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 774 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181652</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of goods under Chapter 94 of the Central Excise Tariff, dismissing M/s. Tanzeem Screenarts&#039; appeal and allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the impugned order. The case was heard in compliance with a remand order from the Supreme Court, addressing the classification issue collectively in two appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>