https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326667 The High Court held that the Revenue's appropriation of a rebate against a disputed amount, despite a Tribunal stay order, was arbitrary and against natural justice principles. The Court rejected the Revenue's reliance on a previous judgment, emphasizing that adjusting dues against rebates should not undermine Tribunal orders. It deemed the Revenue's actions impermissible and beyond jurisdiction, quashing the order and directing an independent appeal decision by the Tribunal. The Court stressed that recovery attempts during appeals, when stay orders are in place, are unjust and should not influence proceedings. en-us Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326667 The High Court held that the Revenue's appropriation of a rebate against a disputed amount, despite a Tribunal stay order, was arbitrary and against natural justice principles. The Court rejected the Revenue's reliance on a previous judgment, emphasizing that adjusting dues against rebates should not undermine Tribunal orders. It deemed the Revenue's actions impermissible and beyond jurisdiction, quashing the order and directing an independent appeal decision by the Tribunal. The Court stressed that recovery attempts during appeals, when stay orders are in place, are unjust and should not influence proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326667