<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 777 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326663</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal regarding the eligibility of cenvat credit on service tax payment for Clearing &amp;amp; Forwarding Services received from abroad. It was determined that the foreign C&amp;amp;F agent&#039;s service was integral to the Respondent&#039;s business, qualifying as an input service. The Commissioner (Appeals) correctly interpreted the term &quot;business&quot; broadly, encompassing related activities. The department&#039;s inconsistent stance on tax payment and credit utilization weakened their argument, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the Respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 777 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326663</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal regarding the eligibility of cenvat credit on service tax payment for Clearing &amp;amp; Forwarding Services received from abroad. It was determined that the foreign C&amp;amp;F agent&#039;s service was integral to the Respondent&#039;s business, qualifying as an input service. The Commissioner (Appeals) correctly interpreted the term &quot;business&quot; broadly, encompassing related activities. The department&#039;s inconsistent stance on tax payment and credit utilization weakened their argument, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the Respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>