<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1252 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181646</link>
    <description>Supplementary agreements can modify an original arbitration clause and require the parties to follow a different dispute-resolution sequence before any inter se arbitration arises. Where the amended contract obliges the parties to first pursue claims jointly through a third-party mechanism, arbitration between them becomes contingent on residual disputes surviving that process. On that basis, a Section 11(6) application for appointment of an arbitrator was premature while the contractual mechanism with SCOPE still had to be exhausted, and the appointment order was set aside. The court also directed that the final bill process be completed promptly so that any surviving disputes could then proceed to arbitration if necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:25:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1252 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181646</link>
      <description>Supplementary agreements can modify an original arbitration clause and require the parties to follow a different dispute-resolution sequence before any inter se arbitration arises. Where the amended contract obliges the parties to first pursue claims jointly through a third-party mechanism, arbitration between them becomes contingent on residual disputes surviving that process. On that basis, a Section 11(6) application for appointment of an arbitrator was premature while the contractual mechanism with SCOPE still had to be exhausted, and the appointment order was set aside. The court also directed that the final bill process be completed promptly so that any surviving disputes could then proceed to arbitration if necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>