<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 774 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326660</link>
    <description>Printed sheets used for illuminated sign boxes were treated as products of the printing industry under Chapter 49 because printing was not merely incidental; it gave the goods their essential character and commercial identity. The Tribunal found the facts materially similar to earlier precedent on printed sheets and labels, and followed the same reasoning for the later period. The contention that the articles were only parts of illuminated signs and therefore classifiable under Heading 94.05 was rejected. The demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 774 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326660</link>
      <description>Printed sheets used for illuminated sign boxes were treated as products of the printing industry under Chapter 49 because printing was not merely incidental; it gave the goods their essential character and commercial identity. The Tribunal found the facts materially similar to earlier precedent on printed sheets and labels, and followed the same reasoning for the later period. The contention that the articles were only parts of illuminated signs and therefore classifiable under Heading 94.05 was rejected. The demand was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>