https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326648 The High Court directed the competent respondent to decide the petitioner's representation dated 18.1.2016 in accordance with law by passing a speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing. The writ petition was disposed of by issuing mandamus confined to administrative consideration, and the Court expressly refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim for a certificate of no deduction or refund of excess TDS. Compliance was directed within one month from receipt of the certified copy of the order. en-us Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:23:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326648 The High Court directed the competent respondent to decide the petitioner's representation dated 18.1.2016 in accordance with law by passing a speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing. The writ petition was disposed of by issuing mandamus confined to administrative consideration, and the Court expressly refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim for a certificate of no deduction or refund of excess TDS. Compliance was directed within one month from receipt of the certified copy of the order. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326648