<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1065 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181639</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the validity of reassessment proceedings and the addition of Rs. 1,45,125 for allegedly bogus shares was successful. The Tribunal, following a previous decision, deleted the Rs. 1,45,125 addition due to lack of evidence against the assessee, emphasizing the absence of crucial witness statements and cross-examination. As a result, the reassessment proceedings&#039; validity issue became moot. The decision in favor of the assessee was rendered on November 27, 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:22:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1065 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181639</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the validity of reassessment proceedings and the addition of Rs. 1,45,125 for allegedly bogus shares was successful. The Tribunal, following a previous decision, deleted the Rs. 1,45,125 addition due to lack of evidence against the assessee, emphasizing the absence of crucial witness statements and cross-examination. As a result, the reassessment proceedings&#039; validity issue became moot. The decision in favor of the assessee was rendered on November 27, 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>