<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1226 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181640</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing Mark-to-Market loss on forward exchange contracts as a business loss for the appellant in AY 2009-10. The Tribunal emphasized the regular business nature of the appellant&#039;s foreign exchange transactions and cited relevant judicial precedents supporting the allowance of such losses. Finding no conflicting judgments, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the treatment of the loss as a business expense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1226 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181640</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing Mark-to-Market loss on forward exchange contracts as a business loss for the appellant in AY 2009-10. The Tribunal emphasized the regular business nature of the appellant&#039;s foreign exchange transactions and cited relevant judicial precedents supporting the allowance of such losses. Finding no conflicting judgments, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the treatment of the loss as a business expense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>