<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 747 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326633</link>
    <description>In the case, the Tribunal allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2009-10, directing the Assessing Officer to exclude the Fringe Benefit Tax provision from the computation of book profit under section 115JB. However, for the assessment year 2011-12, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of deduction under section 35(2AB) due to the absence of Form 3CL but remanded the issue of allowability of expenses under section 35 to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 747 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326633</link>
      <description>In the case, the Tribunal allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2009-10, directing the Assessing Officer to exclude the Fringe Benefit Tax provision from the computation of book profit under section 115JB. However, for the assessment year 2011-12, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of deduction under section 35(2AB) due to the absence of Form 3CL but remanded the issue of allowability of expenses under section 35 to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>