<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 740 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326626</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed both the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of expenditure for Offshore Fund II and the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning the verification and allowance of the Rs. 2.5 crores expenditure. The tribunal upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, emphasizing the importance of substantiating claims with proper evidence and distinguishing between capital and revenue expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:20:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 740 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326626</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed both the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of expenditure for Offshore Fund II and the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning the verification and allowance of the Rs. 2.5 crores expenditure. The tribunal upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, emphasizing the importance of substantiating claims with proper evidence and distinguishing between capital and revenue expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>