<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 731 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326617</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by condoning the delay in filing, directing valuation to the Government Valuation Officer for fair market value determination, correcting the calculation mistake in land area, and excluding 29,000 sq. yds. of land held as stock-in-trade from wealth tax for A.Y. 2007-08.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 731 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326617</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by condoning the delay in filing, directing valuation to the Government Valuation Officer for fair market value determination, correcting the calculation mistake in land area, and excluding 29,000 sq. yds. of land held as stock-in-trade from wealth tax for A.Y. 2007-08.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>