https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181629 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s order regarding the treatment of short-term capital gains and the assessee's intention in holding the shares. The Tribunal relied on past precedents and the principle of consistency in treatment, as established by the Bombay High Court, to support its decision. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order and upheld the treatment of the gains as directed. en-us Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:29:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181629 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s order regarding the treatment of short-term capital gains and the assessee's intention in holding the shares. The Tribunal relied on past precedents and the principle of consistency in treatment, as established by the Bombay High Court, to support its decision. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order and upheld the treatment of the gains as directed. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181629