<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 89 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3105</link>
    <description>The court set aside the interest demand for insurance and freight charges from April 2001 to 11.5.2001, ruling it not payable due to the absence of required elements. The case was remanded for re-calculation of interest from 11.5.2001 to July 2004, partially allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 89 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3105</link>
      <description>The court set aside the interest demand for insurance and freight charges from April 2001 to 11.5.2001, ruling it not payable due to the absence of required elements. The case was remanded for re-calculation of interest from 11.5.2001 to July 2004, partially allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>