<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1130 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181605</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for all three disallowed claims. The decision was based on the findings that the claims were made in good faith, with full disclosure of relevant particulars, and the issues involved interpretations of law rather than concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:03:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1130 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181605</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for all three disallowed claims. The decision was based on the findings that the claims were made in good faith, with full disclosure of relevant particulars, and the issues involved interpretations of law rather than concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>