<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (8) TMI 122 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181586</link>
    <description>In valuing unquoted shares on a break-up basis for estate duty, goodwill must be treated as a company asset and valued by the capitalisation of super-profits method, not reduced merely because the deceased held only a minority interest. The valuation concerns the goodwill of the company itself, and the Appellate Controller&#039;s approach was upheld while the Tribunal&#039;s reduction was rejected. A proposed dividend shown in the balance-sheet is not deductible in computing the break-up value of the shares, because it does not reduce the company&#039;s assets for valuation purposes. The reference was answered against the accountable person and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:12:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (8) TMI 122 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181586</link>
      <description>In valuing unquoted shares on a break-up basis for estate duty, goodwill must be treated as a company asset and valued by the capitalisation of super-profits method, not reduced merely because the deceased held only a minority interest. The valuation concerns the goodwill of the company itself, and the Appellate Controller&#039;s approach was upheld while the Tribunal&#039;s reduction was rejected. A proposed dividend shown in the balance-sheet is not deductible in computing the break-up value of the shares, because it does not reduce the company&#039;s assets for valuation purposes. The reference was answered against the accountable person and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>