<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 730 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326616</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata upheld the penalty of &amp;amp;8377; 10,000 imposed on BSNL under Rule 15(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, for wrongful Cenvat credit availed. The Tribunal found the first appellate authority&#039;s reasoning sufficient and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, noting the lack of substantial reasons for increasing the penalty. The decision affirmed the penalty amount, concluding that the first appellate authority&#039;s justification was legally sound and warranted no interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 730 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326616</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata upheld the penalty of &amp;amp;8377; 10,000 imposed on BSNL under Rule 15(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, for wrongful Cenvat credit availed. The Tribunal found the first appellate authority&#039;s reasoning sufficient and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, noting the lack of substantial reasons for increasing the penalty. The decision affirmed the penalty amount, concluding that the first appellate authority&#039;s justification was legally sound and warranted no interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>