https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326612 The Kerala HC note states that where a former licensee's licence cancellation and related proceedings had been stayed in collateral proceedings, the authority could treat him as falling within the preferential category under Rule 5(1)(a) of the Kerala Abkari Shops Disposal Rules, 2002. It also records that the fresh order was not a verbatim reproduction of the earlier order and that the administrative authority had substantially addressed the objections raised. The fact that the claimant had participated in the auction from the general category did not bar reliance on the preference claim, as the challenge to denial of preference had been pursued promptly. The cancellation of the provisional allotment in favour of the appellant was upheld. en-us Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:53:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326612 The Kerala HC note states that where a former licensee's licence cancellation and related proceedings had been stayed in collateral proceedings, the authority could treat him as falling within the preferential category under Rule 5(1)(a) of the Kerala Abkari Shops Disposal Rules, 2002. It also records that the fresh order was not a verbatim reproduction of the earlier order and that the administrative authority had substantially addressed the objections raised. The fact that the claimant had participated in the auction from the general category did not bar reliance on the preference claim, as the challenge to denial of preference had been pursued promptly. The cancellation of the provisional allotment in favour of the appellant was upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326612