<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 724 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326610</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and cross objection in a case concerning the disallowance of CENVAT Credit for using ingots and billets of thickness exceeding 3 inches in manufacturing MS Bars of 6 mm. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the demand, emphasizing the lack of proof from the Department and failure to establish the inadmissibility of the credit. The Tribunal found the evidence insufficient and ruled in favor of M/s Salasar Steel Industries on 22/3/16.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 724 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326610</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and cross objection in a case concerning the disallowance of CENVAT Credit for using ingots and billets of thickness exceeding 3 inches in manufacturing MS Bars of 6 mm. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the demand, emphasizing the lack of proof from the Department and failure to establish the inadmissibility of the credit. The Tribunal found the evidence insufficient and ruled in favor of M/s Salasar Steel Industries on 22/3/16.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>