<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 722 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326608</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified the interpretation of conditions for duty exemption under Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962. It affirmed the petitioner&#039;s compliance with import conditions for gold dore bars, deemed the demand for a packaging list as improper, and set aside observations on unchallenged show cause notices. The judgment modified the Single Judge&#039;s order, allowing the appeal in part and disposing of related matters without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 722 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326608</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified the interpretation of conditions for duty exemption under Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962. It affirmed the petitioner&#039;s compliance with import conditions for gold dore bars, deemed the demand for a packaging list as improper, and set aside observations on unchallenged show cause notices. The judgment modified the Single Judge&#039;s order, allowing the appeal in part and disposing of related matters without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>