<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 718 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326604</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Miscellaneous Application for Condonation of Delay, emphasizing that the delay was condoned due to the specific circumstances and lack of provision for serving orders to authorized persons under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:52:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 718 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326604</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Miscellaneous Application for Condonation of Delay, emphasizing that the delay was condoned due to the specific circumstances and lack of provision for serving orders to authorized persons under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>