<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 706 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326592</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the loss of Rs. 2,13,43,725/- on the restatement of forward contracts at year-end exchange rate is not speculative. The loss was deemed allowable as a business loss under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The AO was instructed to remove the disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 706 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326592</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the loss of Rs. 2,13,43,725/- on the restatement of forward contracts at year-end exchange rate is not speculative. The loss was deemed allowable as a business loss under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The AO was instructed to remove the disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>