<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 66 - HIGH COURT GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3093</link>
    <description>Excise recovery against an auction purchaser was found unsustainable where the authorities sought to recover the erstwhile unit&#039;s dues and penalty nearly ten years after transfer. The governing principle applied was that a statutory recovery power, even without an express limitation period, must still be exercised within a reasonable time. Because the unit had been purchased through auction in 1995 and recovery was first initiated only in 2004, the inordinate unexplained delay barred enforcement against the transferees. The action was therefore treated as time-barred and invalid against the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 66 - HIGH COURT GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3093</link>
      <description>Excise recovery against an auction purchaser was found unsustainable where the authorities sought to recover the erstwhile unit&#039;s dues and penalty nearly ten years after transfer. The governing principle applied was that a statutory recovery power, even without an express limitation period, must still be exercised within a reasonable time. Because the unit had been purchased through auction in 1995 and recovery was first initiated only in 2004, the inordinate unexplained delay barred enforcement against the transferees. The action was therefore treated as time-barred and invalid against the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>