<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1419 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181575</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal for AY 2009-10 was dismissed as consequential to the Court&#039;s earlier dismissal of its appeals for AYs 2007-08 and 2008-09. The order records that the prior judgment dated 27 May 2015 had already disposed of the related years, and the same result followed here without further separate adjudication. The matter therefore reflects a connected line of tax litigation in which the later appeal did not survive once the earlier appeals had been rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:49:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1419 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181575</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal for AY 2009-10 was dismissed as consequential to the Court&#039;s earlier dismissal of its appeals for AYs 2007-08 and 2008-09. The order records that the prior judgment dated 27 May 2015 had already disposed of the related years, and the same result followed here without further separate adjudication. The matter therefore reflects a connected line of tax litigation in which the later appeal did not survive once the earlier appeals had been rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>