<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 1012 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181565</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 37,66,432/- as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in favor of the assessee, ruling that deemed dividend could only be assessed in the hands of a shareholder of the lender company and not in the hands of any other person. The appeal was dismissed, and the decision to delete the addition of deemed dividend was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:44:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 1012 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181565</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 37,66,432/- as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in favor of the assessee, ruling that deemed dividend could only be assessed in the hands of a shareholder of the lender company and not in the hands of any other person. The appeal was dismissed, and the decision to delete the addition of deemed dividend was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>