https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3091 The Court held that the recovery action against the petitioner was time-barred as it was initiated beyond a reasonable period from the petitioner's acquisition of the unit. Emphasizing the need for actions to be taken reasonably promptly, the Court concluded that the impugned order was unjustifiable. As a result, the Court allowed the petition, quashed the order-in-original, and made the rule absolute with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3091 The Court held that the recovery action against the petitioner was time-barred as it was initiated beyond a reasonable period from the petitioner's acquisition of the unit. Emphasizing the need for actions to be taken reasonably promptly, the Court concluded that the impugned order was unjustifiable. As a result, the Court allowed the petition, quashed the order-in-original, and made the rule absolute with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3091