https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181563 The court held that the government could not deny the subsidy based on procedural delays. The substantive eligibility conditions were fulfilled before the Scheme's expiration, applying the principle of promissory estoppel. The respondents were instructed to assess the petitioner's application promptly and pay the subsidy if eligible. The court emphasized that the petitioner should not be penalized for delays beyond their control. The petition was granted without costs, and security was to be refunded. en-us Tue, 22 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181563 The court held that the government could not deny the subsidy based on procedural delays. The substantive eligibility conditions were fulfilled before the Scheme's expiration, applying the principle of promissory estoppel. The respondents were instructed to assess the petitioner's application promptly and pay the subsidy if eligible. The court emphasized that the petitioner should not be penalized for delays beyond their control. The petition was granted without costs, and security was to be refunded. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 22 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181563