<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 388 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181558</link>
    <description>Where a statutory tribunal is vested with final adjudicatory authority and its procedure incorporates the Code of Civil Procedure for matters not otherwise provided, it may be treated as a subordinate court for contempt purposes and as having the incidental power to enforce its own award. The Court further held that the contempt application was initiated within limitation when notice was ordered, but refused to find wilful civil contempt because the respondents had pursued appellate and other remedies and the circumstances did not show deliberate disobedience. Procedural objections on maintainability and affidavit support were also rejected as meritless or merely procedural.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:21:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 388 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181558</link>
      <description>Where a statutory tribunal is vested with final adjudicatory authority and its procedure incorporates the Code of Civil Procedure for matters not otherwise provided, it may be treated as a subordinate court for contempt purposes and as having the incidental power to enforce its own award. The Court further held that the contempt application was initiated within limitation when notice was ordered, but refused to find wilful civil contempt because the respondents had pursued appellate and other remedies and the circumstances did not show deliberate disobedience. Procedural objections on maintainability and affidavit support were also rejected as meritless or merely procedural.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>