<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 17 - HIGH COURT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3090</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of the appeal due to the lawyer&#039;s absence, emphasizing the lack of specific findings against the Appellants. The Court disagreed with penalizing both the corporation and its proprietor, highlighting the failure to consider the Custom House Agent&#039;s liability. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the Appellants, restoring the appeals for fresh consideration by the Tribunal and emphasizing the need for a thorough review of the Appellants&#039; liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 17 - HIGH COURT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3090</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of the appeal due to the lawyer&#039;s absence, emphasizing the lack of specific findings against the Appellants. The Court disagreed with penalizing both the corporation and its proprietor, highlighting the failure to consider the Custom House Agent&#039;s liability. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the Appellants, restoring the appeals for fresh consideration by the Tribunal and emphasizing the need for a thorough review of the Appellants&#039; liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>